Comments on: 2014-2015 Year-In-Review: Standards Based Grading /blog_archive/2015/07/17/2014-2015-year-in-review-standards-based-grading/ iteration, making, building, and coding in education Fri, 17 Jul 2015 20:43:55 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.6 By: Evan Weinberg /blog_archive/2015/07/17/2014-2015-year-in-review-standards-based-grading/#comment-389 Fri, 17 Jul 2015 20:43:55 +0000 http://evanweinberg.com/?p=2253#comment-389 In reply to Andrew Knauft.

Thanks for the feedback – I think that’s the first thing I’ll adjust for the reasons you mentioned.

I haven’t heard much from others on how they translate from mastery levels to grades for reporting, especially in terms of communicating those levels. I’m curious what you (and others) do in this regard.

]]> By: Andrew Knauft /blog_archive/2015/07/17/2014-2015-year-in-review-standards-based-grading/#comment-388 Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:33:24 +0000 http://evanweinberg.com/?p=2253#comment-388 Changing from 1-5 to 6-10: genius. Definitely doing that next year.
I think the expiring credits is a good idea. We want students to see these assessments as a part of their learning process, not the end of it; students who say they need more time before testing aren’t really grasping that idea. As long as they have ways to earn credits to take the test again at the time they would have originally planned to assess, you’re not really changing anything for them.

]]>